drainage tube  (Cook Medical Inc)

Journal: DEN Open

Article Title: Severe Bacteremia Caused by Clostridium butyricum Following Endoscopic Ultrasound‐Guided Peripancreatic Fluid Drainage for Walled‐off Necrosis: A Case Report

doi: 10.1002/deo2.70325

Figure Lengend Snippet: Emergency endoscopic ultrasound‐guided peripancreatic fluid drainage (EUS‐PFD) using a double pigtail plastic stent (DPPS; 7Fr × 7 cm, Through and Pass, Gadelius Medical, Tokyo, Japan) and an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube (6Fr, Flexima; Boston Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). (a) Convex array EUS image showing an encapsulated WON adjacent to the stomach wall. Real‐time EUS‐guided puncture of the necrotic cavity was safely performed using a 19‐gauge fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) needle under direct visualization. (b) Fluoroscopic image obtained after the placement of two guidewires. The first DPPS (7Fr × 7 cm, Through and Pass) and ENBD tube (6Fr, Flexima) were successfully inserted for internal and external drainage. (c) Endoscopic image showing the deployment of the DPPS into the cyst cavity during the procedure.

Article Snippet: EUS‐PFD was reattempted using another DPPS (7Fr × 7 cm; Through and Pass, Gadelius Medical, Tokyo, Japan) and an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube for external drainage (6Fr, Flexima; Boston Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) (Figure ).

Techniques:

Journal: DEN Open

Article Title: Successful Endoscopic Ultrasound‐Guided Transgastric Drainage for Intra‐Abdominal Abscess Caused by Delayed Perforation After Gastric Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

doi: 10.1002/deo2.70301

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Computed tomography image showed the increasing size of the abscess. (b) Endoscopic ultrasound image showing the puncture (red arrow) of the fluid collection using a 19‐G needle. (c) Drainage procedure showing the outflow of turbid, viscous, purulent material from the abscess cavity. (d) Placement of a 6Fr nasobiliary drainage tube and a 7Fr double‐pigtail stent in the abscess cavity.

Article Snippet: Subsequently, a 6‐Fr nasobiliary drainage tube (Flexima ENBD Catheter, Boston Scientific, Japan) and 7‐Fr double‐pigtail stent (AdvanixJ; Boston Scientific, Japan) were deployed (Figure ).

Techniques: Computed Tomography

Journal: Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Article Title: The three-tube method under fluoroscopy guidance for post-gastrectomy gastric fistula

doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-1778

Figure Lengend Snippet: Contrast radiography images of the same patient. (A) Leakage of the contrast agent into the abdominal cavity through the proximal fistula of the greater curvature of the gastric remnant (black arrow). (B) The location and size of the abscess cavity on angiography with a 5 F vertebral artery catheter (red arrow). (C) The nasojejunal feeding tube and gastrointestinal decompression tube placed in the proximal jejunum and gastric antrum, respectively (blue arrows). (D) A 5 F pigtail catheter and a 10 F multi-lateral hole catheter placed in the abscess cavity (yellow arrows).

Article Snippet: An 8–10.2 F multi-lateral hole external drainage tube (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA) was then introduced along a guidewire, and was positioned at the lower pole of the cavity ( ).

Techniques:

Journal: Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

Article Title: The three-tube method under fluoroscopy guidance for post-gastrectomy gastric fistula

doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-1778

Figure Lengend Snippet: Contrast radiography images of the same patient after 1 week. (A) The size of the abscess cavity on angiography with a 5 F straight multi-lateral hole catheter (black arrow). (B) The size of the abscess cavity on angiography with a 10 F multi-lateral hole drainage tube (black arrow).

Article Snippet: An 8–10.2 F multi-lateral hole external drainage tube (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA) was then introduced along a guidewire, and was positioned at the lower pole of the cavity ( ).

Techniques: